Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 [work] 🆕 🆒

: The report uses strong cautionary language, suggesting that Zurarah’s prominence did not exempt him from the Imam's correction or disapproval. Scholarly Interpretation

This report is often cited to resolve discrepancies where a narrator might have been accused of "Ghuluw" (extremism) or "Waqf" (stopping the lineage of Imams). Scholarly Interpretations Rijal Al Kashi Report 176

But the esoteric camp—led by the late Dr. Faisal al-Muqri—argues it refers to the "176 sins of the narrator." In Report 176, Al-Kashi does not merely judge if a narrator lied. He judges if the narrator saw the truth and remained silent . : The report uses strong cautionary language, suggesting

The Vanishing Scrolls: Deconstructing the Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 Faisal al-Muqri—argues it refers to the "176 sins

Unlike the standard 1,000+ narrators found in Al-Kashi’s public works, Report 176 contains only 22 entries. Each entry is marked with a crimson Mu'tabar (Authentic) or Da'if (Weak) stamp. However, the ink bleeds in a way that suggests the stamps were applied three hundred years after the text was written.