These are marginally better but inconsistent. Because different users submit answers, the quality varies wildly. One solution might be a beautiful, step-by-step proof; the next might be an illegible photo of handwritten notes with a false assumption midway through. Furthermore, these platforms do not explain why a particular approach works. They simply give an answer.
If the back-of-the-book keys aren't enough, the mathematics community has created several high-quality supplements: a book of abstract algebra pinter solutions better
The two conditions are equivalent. This is a standard trick: squaring preserving structure implies commutativity. These are marginally better but inconsistent
Having a manual is a double-edged sword. To truly master Pinter’s material, you must use solutions as a , not a crutch. you must use solutions as a